EDC 102 School Data - 2011

Capital City Upper School- Washington D.C.
Name of Student: Kathryn Lyons

Be sure that each of your paragraphs includes:

A strong topic sentence.
An explanation of why the data you chose to cite relates to the subject you are addressing, e.g. you should state why you feel that the student/teacher ratio informs your judgement about the school's ability to provide high quality teaching. These sentences should be based on the definitions of some of these measures on the InfoWorks site, but can also include your own reasoning about the subject.
Multiple pieces of specific data to support your claim. Each measure should include a comparison so tat the reader can judge whether the value is relatively high or low.
Include the students' view of the school when possible.

Capital City Upper School

HISTORICAL AYP REPORT

CAPITAL CITY PCS - UPPER SCHOOL

Year

: 2011

Category

: SECONDARY

Problem Areas

READING - In Need of Impr. Y2
MATH - In Need of Impr. Y2

Category

Ethnicity

Disab.

Lep/Nep

Econ. Disab.

TOTAL

SCHOOL
MADE AYP

(1)

Asian / Pacific Islander

Black, non-Hispanic

Hispanic

American Indian / Alaskan Native

White, non-Hispanic

READING

-*

-

No

No

-

-

-

-

No

No

NO

-

-

No

No

-

-

-

No

Yes (2)

No

NO

-

-

No

No

-

-

No

-

No

No

NO

MATH

-

-

No

No

-

-

-

-

No

No

NO

-

-

Yes (2)

No

-

-

-

No

Yes (2)

Yes (2)

NO

-

-

No

Yes (2)

-

-

No

-

Yes (2)

Yes (2)

NO

ATTENDANCE

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Yes

YES

-

Yes

Yes

Yes

-

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

YES

-

Yes

Yes

Yes

-

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

YES

*

No data are displayed for groups with less than 25 students.

Yes means group made AYP. No means group did not make AYP.

(1)

Group membership is not known.

(2)

Group made Safe Harbor.

AYP REPORTS

Click to print this report

AYP REPORT

CAPITAL CITY PCS - UPPER SCHOOL

Year

: 2011

Group

: PUBLIC CHARTER

Subject

:
READING ()

Category

: SECONDARY

MET AYP?

Acad. Target

Safe Harbor

NO

NO

GROUP

2010
%
PROFICIENT

READING, 2011(‡)

Number
in Group

Number
Tested

%
Tested

%
Proficient

Met
% Tested
(95%)

Met Prof.
Target (1)
(71.79%)

Safe
Harbor (2)

ETHNICITY

Asian/Pacific Islanders*

-

11

-

-

-

-

-

-

Black/Non-hispanic

52.17%

65

65

100.00%

52.31%

Yes

No

No

Hispanic

53.23%

80

80

100.00%

55.70%

Yes

No

No

White/Non-hispanic*

-

4

-

-

-

-

-

-

GENDER (3)

Female

52.00%

86

86

100.00%

60.47%

-

-

-

Male

57.14%

74

74

100.00%

53.42%

-

-

-

SPECIAL EDUCATION (4)

Disabled (5)

-

34

34

-

30.30%

-

No

No

ENGLISH PROFICIENCY

Lep/Nep*

38.89%

21

-

-

-

-

-

-

ECONOMIC STATUS

Econ. Disadvantaged

51.14%

123

123

100.00%

54.92%

Yes

No

No

MIGRANT STATUS (3)

Migrant*

-

1

-

-

-

-

-

-

TOTAL

54.03%

160

160

100.00%

57.23%

YES

NO

NO

Summary Paragraph(s)

Teaching

Information Reported By Schools

Information Reported by Students

Summary Paragraph(s)

Family,Community, and Home Life

Information Reported By Schools

Information Reported by Students

Summary Paragraph(s)

Safe and Supportive Schools

Information Reported By Schools

Information Reported by Students

Summary Paragraph(s)

Funding and Resources

FundingGraphDOC

Summary Paragraph